Fortran vs. Algol

Filed under: Retrocomputing — jac @ May 13, 2006 - 2:57 pm

I recently stumbled upon Google Trends. I though it might be interesting to compare the search volume for the first two computer languages I learned: Fortran vs. Algol

- fortran    - algol

Fortran vs. Algol

The results are not too surprising, since Fortran is still widely used by scientists and engineers. Algol, which, according to The Retrocomputing Museum, is “the common ancestor of C, Pascal, Algol-68, Modula, Ada, and most other conventional languages that aren’t BASIC, FORTRAN, or COBOL,” isn’t used as much anymore.

3 Responses to “Fortran vs. Algol”

  1. Karen says:

    Good Gawd…and i *thought* I ever had a chance as tech-No-dweeb to catch up one of these days…YIKES!

    I haven’t a clue what this is about…*sigh*

    Just have to leave this techie stuff to all them Wizards out there on the Internets.

  2. JD says:

    I learned Cobol over 20 years ago (showing my age), but have never used it since. Of course, Cobol’s linear structure, while straightforward and easy to understand, has completely gone out of favor as well, due to OOP. I think I’ll stick to web-friendly programming. ;)

  3. rlrr says:

    I think I’ll stick to web-friendly programming.

    See Ruby and Ruby on Rails. :)

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>




  



March 2010
M T W T F S S
« Feb    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Statistics

There are currently 42 posts and 25 comments, contained within 13 categories.


Miscellaneous
- Source Files

Add to Technorati Favorites


Storage B
-OpenDDS 2.1.1
-OpenDDS 2.1
-It Proved Just Too Difficult
-Bridge Simulators
-C++0x FAQ
-Skepticism and standards of evidence applied development practices
-OpenDDS 2.0.1
-OpenDDS 2.0
-OpenDDS Version 1.3 Released
-LGPL License Option Added to Qt

Valid XHTML 1.0!

Valid CSS!